Posted on

Concreteness in Generative Phonology: Evidence from French by Bernard Tranel

By Bernard Tranel

Show description

Read Online or Download Concreteness in Generative Phonology: Evidence from French PDF

Similar grammar books

Interaction and Grammar

Many students of language have approved a view of grammar as a truly delineated and internally coherent constitution that's most sensible understood as a self-contained approach. The participants to this quantity suggest a really diverse means of coming near near and figuring out grammar: taking as their place to begin the placement that the very integrity of grammar is certain up with its position within the higher schemes of the association of human behavior, quite social interplay, their essays discover a wealthy number of linkages among interplay and grammar.

Portuguese Syntax: New Comparative Studies (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax)

This quantity is a suite of formerly unpublished articles concentrating on the next points of Portuguese syntax: clause constitution, clitic placement, notice order edition, pronominal method, verb circulate, quantification, and distribution of debris. The articles are written in the rules and parameters framework and distinction Portuguese with different Romance languages.

La Grammaire du latin

Le Bescherelle Grammaire du latin est une grammaire très basic et complète de l. a. langue latine. Il a pour objectif de permettre l. a. lecture, le traduction et l'interprétation des textes. Sujet traité: Langues Description écriture: Ce Bescherelle comprend quatre events : - écriture et prononciation; - morphologie; - syntaxe; - grammaire de l'énoncé et du texte.

Semantics and morphosyntactic variation : qualities and the grammar of property concepts

This booklet explores a key factor in linguistic thought, the systematic edition in shape among semantic equivalents throughout languages. contrasting perspectives of the position of lexical which means within the research of such version are available within the literature: (i) uniformity, wherein lexical that means is common, and edition arises from idiosyncratic variations within the stock and phonological form of language-particular useful fabric, and (ii) transparency, wherein systematic version in shape arises from systematic edition within the which means of easy lexical goods.

Extra resources for Concreteness in Generative Phonology: Evidence from French

Example text

We turn to Hagstrom’s implementation of it next. â•… Notice that although the PL reading is unavailable in this example, the functional reading remains available. It is one of the arguments Krifka provides for formally distinguishing Â�functional and PL readings. 3â•… Syntactic and semantic contribution of the Q-morpheme Hagstrom (1998) explores the syntactic and semantic contribution of the interrogative morpheme (Q-morpheme) to the derivation of interrogatives and concludes that it plays an important role in the derivation of the PL and SP readings in these constructions.

Russian Kakoj diplomat kakogo žurnalista priglasil na užin? ╇ Semantics of multiple interrogatives  Russian allows for the second complex wh-phrase to optionally remain in situ. 3 When the lower complex wh-phrase is fronted over the higher one, the Interpretive Superiority effect does not arise. 4 (47) a. PL/SP Which journalist did which diplomat invite to the dinner? Russian Kakogo žurnalista kakoj diplomat priglasil na užin? ’ Another context in which SP readings appear (and even seem to be forced) is when the wh-phrases are separated from their scope position by an island boundary, as in (48) with the if-clause, and in (49) with a relative clause.

E. e. a set of sets of propositions; the semantic type 〈pt,t〉). Let us consider how the PL and SP readings of a simple question like Who bought what? are derived compositionally. 17 (82) a. [CP Qj-C0 [QP tj [TP who bought what]]] PL SP By movement to C0, the Q-morpheme leaves behind a variable (tj) whose value ranges over generalized choice functions. A generalized choice function (type 〈αt,α〉) basically picks a member out of the set it is merged with. In the derivation of the PL reading, the choice function variable takes what (denoting a set of individuals) as its argument returning an individual (〈e〉).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.63 of 5 – based on 10 votes