Posted on

Brain Korea 21 Phase II: A New Evaluation Mode by Somi Seong

By Somi Seong

The mind Korea 21 software (BK21), which seeks to make Korean study universities globally aggressive and to provide extra top of the range researchers in Korea, presents investment to graduate scholars and professors who belong to investigate teams at best universities. The authors boost quantitative and qualitative versions to guage how good BK21 is pleasant its targets and make feedback for extra stimulating Korean collage learn.

Show description

Read Online or Download Brain Korea 21 Phase II: A New Evaluation Mode PDF

Similar nonfiction_2 books

Vowel Prosthesis in Romance

This booklet offers for the 1st time an in-depth ancient account of vowel prosthesis within the Romance languages. Vowel prosthesis is a transformation which consists of the looks of a non-etymological vowel at first of a note: a well-recognized instance is the preliminary e which looks within the improvement of Latin sperare to Spanish esperar and French esp?

Raiders From the Rings

For many of the Spacers, it used to be simply one other Earth raid, a determined try and rob the mummy planet of the meals and fabrics they had to proceed their lifestyles as outcasts within the asteriod jewelry. For Ben Trefon of Mars it used to be whatever extra: his first likelihood as a full-fledged raider, with a boat at his command and a task to do while he reached strike element.

Way Ahead: Work Book 1

"Way forward" is a six-level direction for basic tuition childrens who're studying English as a moment language. The buildings and services of the English language are taught via quite a few child-centred actions, that have been conscientiously graded and are compatible for periods in a number of cultural backgrounds.

Extra resources for Brain Korea 21 Phase II: A New Evaluation Mode

Sample text

BK21 funding covers scholarships and stipends for graduate students, postdoctoral scholars, and contract-based researchers but does not cover professors’ labor cost or costs of equipment and facilities. BK21 funding is not project-based. 4 The award size is basically proportional to the size of the department. 5 Although BK21 funds scholarships and stipends for individuals, individual recipients are not selected on their own merit but on the merit of their department and university. Award selection criteria are based on the qualifications of the research group to which the individuals belong, the excellence of their department, and their university’s commitment to the department, institutional reform, and research infrastructure.

The Lee, Lee, and Kim (2005) study was the only one to examine the linkage among different elements of the program in a logic model framework. Still, it did not develop a full logic model for directing an objective assessment of the BK21 program impact. None of the Phase I program evaluations made the effort to establish a systematic model for objective assessment of the program’s net contributions. 14 Most previous evaluations assumed that programlevel performance is the sum of recipients’ individual performance indicators.

K. Kim et al. (2005) include focus group interviews with nonrecipients, but these interviews were not designed to compare the performance of recipients with that of nonrecipients. The KISTEP (2007) Employer Survey includes questions on both program participants and nonparticipants but does not account for variables beyond program participation that may have influenced worker performance; hence, it does not allow analysis of net program effects on job capabilities. Third, previous evaluations lacked evaluation models that were logically consistent, theoretically sound, and practical enough to show net program effects.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.52 of 5 – based on 34 votes